Loading…

Commentary on Romans is unavailable, but you can change that!

This commentary on Paul’s letter to the Romans summarizes and completes Ernst Käsemann’s lifelong study of Paul’s theology and of this epistle in particular. As is common in his writings, Käsemann in this commentary has gone his own, frequently provocative way. He has emphasized theological rather than historical questions; as a result, this commentary divides Romans into sections according to...

psychologically, i.e., that Paul need not fear the imperial capital since he is obligated to the whole cosmos (contra Gutjahr; Bardenhewer; Gaugler; J. Knox; Glombitza, “Scham,” 74ff.). Rather, we have here a fixed confessional formula which, in emphatic negation, replaces a ὁμολογεῖν (Michel; Barrett, “Not ashamed”; Stuhlmacher, Gerechtigkeit, 78f.), but no longer stresses the original context of the eschatological lawsuit (contra Herold, Zorn, 28–141, 229ff.). It is again clear that gospel and
Page 22
Buy this book at Logos.com